James Lee Burke
- Burning AngelOrion 1995
If my count is correct "Burning Angel" is James Lee
Burke's eighth Robicheaux mystery and for anybody who's never tried them as good a place
to start as any. Robicheaux fans will know the score by now but for those who don't this
is the basic Robicheaux history. Dave Robicheaux, Vietnam vet, present day police officer.
Inhabits and generally suffers in the backwaters of Louisiana. Dave fights both the local
and imported criminal populations and spends some of his time on the right and some on the
wrong, side of the law (as with most series detectives, relations with the top brass are
strained). Robicheaux is a damaged character (past tragedies haunt him), uncertain and as
many others in this genre, disoriented The crimes Robicheaux is sent out to solve are
designed to test his sense of self. Victims are usually close to him, crime usually
threatens literally at home. "Burning Angel" follows the pattern. An old acquaintance
of Dave's one Sonny Marsallas turns up in New Iberia acting cryptically and entrusting a
notebook to Dave's safe-keeping. Marsallas has a history: Vietnam and then various
mercenary jobs in Central America where Dave soon realises he has made some well connected
enemies. The area becomes a magnet for government agents, land speculators and mobsters
with Robicheaux in possession of the much wanted notebook. He soon finds his life on the
line again. Aided by fellow officer Helen Soileau and less official Clete Purcel Private
Investigator, Robicheaux pursues some sort of truth, annoying everyone from the mob to the
local police department. In the process, the moral landscape of present day Louisiana
complete with casual and institutional racism, guilt and pride in the past are well turned
over.
As with the latest Robicheaux adventures the obsession is very much with
the past, both recent US adventures in Asia and Central America and the lost South of the
civil war. James Lee Burke sees the past everywhere and never underestimates its effects
on the present. If I had an argument with this book it would be that there is just too
much plot, too many angles, more than we need . But it's still a fine read. (R.L.)